Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony
74 Overall Score
vs
Canon 3558B002

Canon 3558B002

Canon
36 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
88
Canon
33
Landscape
Sony
75
Canon
27
Street
Sony
74
Canon
38
Budget
Sony
71
Canon
48
Wildlife Sports
Sony
67
Canon
32
Professional
Sony
66
Canon
28
Video Cinema
Sony
64
Canon
33
Macro
Sony
60
Canon
14
Portrait
Sony
58
Canon
45

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS IICanon 3558B002
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm135 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6—
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/3.5-5.6
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony E—
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Canon 3558B002

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II is MX$7,734 cheaper (3.4x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.023score per dollar
vs
Canon 3558B0020.003score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II offers 7.7x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider