Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm

Fujifilm
59 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 14 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 R lens is widely praised for its compact size, sharp image quality, and fast aperture, making it a favorite for street and indoor photography. Users appreciate its lightweight design that pairs well with smaller camera bodies like the X-E3 and X-T1. However, some note minor chromatic aberration at wide apertures and a poorly designed lens hood cap that tends to fall off. Overall, it's considered a solid walk-around lens with excellent value, especially when purchased at a discount.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast f/2 aperture
  • Great for street and indoor photography
  • Excellent value for money
Cons
  • Lens hood cap falls off easily
  • Chromatic aberration at wide apertures
  • Softer corners at wider apertures
  • Mediocre included cleaning kit
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Size and weight 4
🤔 Build quality 3
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Chromatic aberration 2
👎 Lens hood cap 2

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
Fujifilm
66
Street
Sony
90
Fujifilm
72
Budget
Sony
86
Fujifilm
60
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Fujifilm
62
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Fujifilm
63
Portrait
Sony
83
Fujifilm
55
Landscape
Sony
82
Fujifilm
56
Professional
Sony
78
Fujifilm
68
Macro
Sony
66
Fujifilm
50

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSFujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm18 mm
Elements98
Groups87
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements11
Coating—Super EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusLinear motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x★0.14x

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is MX$13,754 cheaper (4.9x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.026score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm0.003score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 8.7x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 18mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider