Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon 4111C005AA

Canon 4111C005AA

Canon
75 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon 4111C005AA

78 out of 100 medium confidence 25 reviews

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens is widely praised as a lightweight, versatile kit lens that delivers sharp images and effective stabilization for its price. Many users appreciate its value as a travel and everyday lens, though some note significant distortion and vignetting at 24mm, a slow aperture, and limited macro capabilities. It is seen as a solid entry-level option but not a replacement for L-series or prime lenses.

Pros
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Sharp image quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Good value for the price
Cons
  • Slow aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Significant distortion at 24mm
  • Vignetting at wide angle
  • Soft corners after correction
  • Limited true macro capability
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 10
👎 Aperture speed 6
👎 Distortion vignetting 5
🤔 Macro capability 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Canon
77
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
80
Street
Sony
88
Canon
58
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
87
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
62
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
84
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Canon
73
Portrait
Sony
82
Canon
44
Professional
Sony
76
Canon
66

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon 4111C005AA
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm105 mm
Elements918
Groups814
Aspherical Elements44
ED Elements11
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/24
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm132 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon 4111C005AA

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is MX$7,044 cheaper (3.0x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.025score per dollar
vs
Canon 4111C005AA0.007score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 3.6x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon 4111C005AA

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon 4111C005AA Better at:

MacroLandscape

Also Consider