Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Rokinon
37 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Rokinon
25
Budget
Sony
91
Rokinon
35
Street
Sony
90
Rokinon
31
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Rokinon
32
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Rokinon
28
Landscape
Sony
79
Rokinon
33
Portrait
Sony
77
Rokinon
22
Professional
Sony
77
Rokinon
34
Macro
Sony
68
Rokinon
52

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSRokinon 100M-E 100mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm100 mm
Elements915
Groups812
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.73 kg
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★305 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:1★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is MX$6,352 cheaper (3.0x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.027score per dollar
vs
Rokinon 100M-E 100mm0.004score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 6.8x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider