Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh
70 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Ricoh
51
Budget
Sony
91
Ricoh
58
Street
Sony
90
Ricoh
75
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Ricoh
73
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Ricoh
54
Macro
Sony
68
Ricoh
82
Landscape
Sony
79
Ricoh
46
Portrait
Sony
77
Ricoh
72
Professional
Sony
77
Ricoh
66

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSRicoh GR IIIx 40mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm40 mm
Elements97
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements1★0
Coating—Nano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EGR
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.26 kg
Filter Thread41 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAF híbrido
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm120 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is MX$23,119 cheaper (8.1x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.027score per dollar
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm0.003score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 9.0x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider