Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon
51 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 193 reviews

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a lens that divides opinion. Many users adore its dreamy, characterful rendering, creamy bokeh, and beautiful color, especially for portraits and low-light work. However, a significant number report issues with slow and unreliable autofocus, softness wide open, and a high price tag that doesn't always match the optical performance. It's a lens that rewards skill and patience but can frustrate those seeking clinical sharpness and fast, consistent AF.

Pros
  • Beautiful creamy bokeh
  • Dreamy, characterful rendering
  • Excellent color and contrast
  • Solid build quality
  • Great for portraits and low light
Cons
  • Slow and unreliable autofocus
  • Soft wide open at f/1.2
  • Very expensive
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Noticeable chromatic aberration
👍 Image quality 35
👎 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 25
👍 Build quality 20
👎 Value for money 18
🤔 Sharpness 22

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
57
Portrait
Nikon
80
Canon
52
Street
Nikon
75
Canon
52
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
41
Travel
Nikon
71
Canon
42
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
54
Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
45
Professional
Nikon
64
Canon
56
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
51

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm50 mm
Elements—8
Groups—6
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg★0.95 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SUSM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification—0.19x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports