Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm

Nikon
70 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
84 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm

88 out of 100 high confidence 145 reviews

The NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and versatility as both a macro and portrait lens. Users highlight its lightweight build, effective VR, and compatibility with Z-series cameras, though some note that autofocus can be slow, especially for macro work, and a few mention focus shifting issues or a plastic feel. Overall, it is considered a top-tier lens that delivers stunning image quality.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Versatile macro and portrait use
  • Lightweight build
  • Effective vibration reduction
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in macro mode
  • Autofocus hunting in some conditions
  • Plastic feel for some users
  • Focus shifting issues reported
  • Bulky with hood attached
👍 Image quality 45
🤔 Autofocus performance 25
👍 Build quality 20
👍 Versatility 30
👍 Value for money 15
👍 Weight and size 18

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Scores

Budget
Nikon
58
Canon
89
Macro
Nikon
82
Canon
61
Travel
Nikon
54
Canon
81
Street
Nikon
50
Canon
80
Portrait
Nikon
39
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
62
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Nikon
68
Canon
77
Landscape
Nikon
63
Canon
70
Professional
Nikon
64
Canon
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min105 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm250 mm
Elements1615
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements1★0
ED Elements11
CoatingNano Crystal and ARNEO CoatingsSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.63 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm★850 mm
Max Magnification1:1★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM is MX$13,511 cheaper (2.8x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm0.003score per dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.011score per dollar

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM offers 3.7x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S 105mm Better at:

Macro

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider