Sigma APO DG OS HSM 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF APO DG OS HSM

Sigma APO DG OS HSM 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF APO DG OS HSM

Sigma
55 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma APO DG OS HSM 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF APO DG OS HSM

72 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Sigma 120-400mm lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its image quality, optical stabilization, and value for money compared to Canon's 100-400 L series, but note it is very heavy and requires good light for sharp results. A few reviewers experienced severe blurriness or autofocus issues, while others found it excellent for wildlife and sports photography when used correctly.

Pros
  • Good image quality for the price
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Quiet and fast HSM autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Good value compared to Canon 100-400 L
Cons
  • Very heavy and bulky
  • Requires good light for sharpness
  • Lens creep when pointed down
  • Autofocus can hunt or shake initially
  • OS cannot be used on tripod
🤔 Image quality 6
👎 Weight and portability 5
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Optical stabilization 4
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 3

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Scores

Budget
Sigma
58
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
70
Nikon
81
Street
Sigma
58
Nikon
74
Macro
Sigma
60
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
47
Nikon
71
Video Cinema
Sigma
60
Nikon
71
Landscape
Sigma
58
Nikon
68
Professional
Sigma
56
Nikon
64
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
57
Nikon
61

Specifications

Sigma APO DG OS HSM 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF APO DG OS HSMNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min120 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max400 mm85 mm
Elements21—
Groups15—
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements3★2
CoatingSuper multi-layer coatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/3.5
Min Aperture4.5-5.63.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight1.64 kg0.48 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMAF-S
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.50 m380 mm★
Max Magnification1:4.2★—

Pros & Cons

Sigma APO DG OS HSM 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 AF APO DG OS HSM

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports