Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
43 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Meike
32
Nikon
89
Budget
Meike
40
Nikon
85
Street
Meike
39
Nikon
84
Macro
Meike
48
Nikon
84
Portrait
Meike
40
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Meike
32
Nikon
82
Landscape
Meike
32
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Nikon
73
Travel
Meike
31
Nikon
70

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups711
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/0.95f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades13★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Meike 35095 m43 35mm is MX$20,775 cheaper (6.2x less).

Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.011score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar

Meike 35095 m43 35mm offers 2.8x better value for money

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider