Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

No customer feedback yet

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Macro
Canon
51
Tamron
91
Budget
Canon
66
Tamron
90
Landscape
Canon
74
Tamron
90
Portrait
Canon
45
Tamron
87
Professional
Canon
65
Tamron
85
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Tamron
84
Travel
Canon
76
Tamron
84
Street
Canon
59
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Tamron
80

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm300 mm
Elements1220
Groups913
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM0.005score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm0.007score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm offers 1.4x better value for money

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider