Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon
66 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm
Sigma
98 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
92 out of 100 high confidence 52 reviews
The Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional sharpness, fast and accurate autofocus, and effective vibration reduction. Users praise its image quality, color rendition, and build, noting it performs well on both DSLR and mirrorless bodies. A few mention the weight and price as considerations, but most consider it worth the investment.
Pros
- Exceptional sharpness
- Fast and accurate autofocus
- Effective vibration reduction
- Excellent image quality and color
- Solid build quality
Cons
- Heavy weight
- High price
- Zoom ring position takes adjustment
- No QD port on tripod foot
Sharpness 15
Autofocus performance 12
Vibration reduction 8
Image quality 10
Build quality 7
Weight 5
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Landscape
Budget
Macro
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 70 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 22 | 20 |
| Groups | 18 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 5 |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.43 kg | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.10 m | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.21x | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S0.001score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm0.008score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm offers 8.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS 300mm
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
