Lightdow LD-240F5.6 240mm
Lightdow
12 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Lightdow LD-240F5.6 240mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 240 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 240 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 13 |
| Groups | 3 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/240 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.79 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.50 m | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Lightdow LD-240F5.6 240mm
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average aperture (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average bokeh (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Lightdow LD-240F5.6 240mm0.003score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.3x better value for money
Lightdow LD-240F5.6 240mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
