Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

Olympus
56 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Olympus
63
Nikon
89
Macro
Olympus
71
Nikon
88
Budget
Olympus
47
Nikon
85
Street
Olympus
66
Nikon
84
Portrait
Olympus
63
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Olympus
57
Nikon
82
Landscape
Olympus
39
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Olympus
49
Nikon
73
Travel
Olympus
49
Nikon
70

Specifications

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min60 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements13★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsNikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.05 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMSCStepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:11:5.26

Pros & Cons

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL V335200BW000 60mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider