Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Street
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Groups | 10 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.015score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004score per dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 offers 3.8x better value for money
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
