Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike
65 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
75 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

This compact 220-degree circular fisheye lens has impressed users with its solid all-metal build, sharp optics, and excellent value for the price. Despite its tiny size that fits in a pocket, it delivers dramatic perspectives ideal for creative and night-sky photography. Some minor drawbacks include a tight mount on Micro Four Thirds bodies and a front cap that could be better, but overall it is praised as a fun and affordable super fisheye.

Pros
  • All-metal build
  • Sharp optics
  • Compact and pocketable
  • Excellent value for price
  • Creates dramatic perspectives
Cons
  • Tight fit on camera body
  • Mediocre front lens cap
  • No firm grip surface for mounting
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Compactness 3
👎 Mounting difficulty 1
👎 Lens cap quality 2

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 76 reviews

The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast f/1.4 aperture, and solid build quality, making it a favorite among APS-C users for low-light, astrophotography, and video work. Many reviewers highlight its excellent value for money compared to brand-name alternatives. However, common criticisms include its relatively large size and weight for a prime lens, the lack of image stabilization, and some concerns about compatibility with full-frame cameras and occasional quality control issues with packaging.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Fast f/1.4 aperture for low light
  • Excellent value for money
  • Solid build quality
  • Quick and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Relatively large and heavy
  • No image stabilization
  • No aperture ring
  • Compatibility issues with full-frame cameras
  • Occasional quality control issues with packaging
👍 Image quality 25
👍 Value for money 15
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
👍 Low light performance 8
👎 Size and weight 7

Scores

Macro
Meike
71
Sigma
78
Professional
Meike
55
Sigma
77
Landscape
Meike
41
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Meike
56
Sigma
75
Budget
Meike
57
Sigma
70
Portrait
Meike
68
Sigma
61
Street
Meike
64
Sigma
68
Wildlife Sports
Meike
36
Sigma
64
Travel
Meike
47
Sigma
60

Specifications

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mmSigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm
Optics
Typefisheyeprime
Focal Length Min4 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max4 mm16 mm
Elements1016
Groups713
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—5★
Coatingmulti-layer nano-coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.19 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread61 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlystepping motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance95 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification—1:10★

Pros & Cons

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm Better at:

Portrait

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider