JVC HARX500

JVC HARX500

JVC
47 Overall Score
vs
JBL Tune 670NC

JBL Tune 670NC

JBL
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

JVC HARX500

85 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

Users consistently praise the JVC HA-RX500 headphones for their exceptional value at around $18, highlighting comfortable oversized ear pads and clear sound quality. A few note the very long 11-foot cord as either a pro or con depending on use, and one long-term owner reports they lasted over six years with minor repairs. Overall, buyers find them a reliable budget choice for everyday listening.

Pros
  • Exceptional value for under $18
  • Comfortable oversized ear pads
  • Clear sound quality
  • Long 11-foot cord
  • Durable build lasting 6+ years
Cons
  • Very long cord may be excessive for some
  • Top padding can irritate bald users
  • Sliding sides may detach over time
  • Connector may wear out
  • Not suitable for headphone amplifier use
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Comfort 4
👍 Sound quality 4
🤔 Cord length 3
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Durability 2

JBL Tune 670NC

87 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

Most users love these JBL headphones, praising excellent sound quality, effective noise cancellation, comfortable fit, and long battery life—many report great value for the price. One reviewer had a defective unit with no sound in one ear. A few users appreciate the easy controls, foldable design, and app connectivity. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with a minor quality control concern.

Pros
  • Excellent sound quality
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Great value for price
Cons
  • Potential defective unit (no sound in one ear)
  • No answers to Q&A questions
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Noise cancellation 4
👍 Battery life 3
👍 Comfort 2
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Build quality 1

Scores

Budget
JVC
53
JBL
90
Commute
JVC
30
JBL
81
Gaming
JVC
28
JBL
79
Work
JVC
23
JBL
78
Music
JVC
42
JBL
74
Studio
JVC
49
JBL
71
Calls
JVC
18
JBL
64

Specifications

JVC HARX500JBL Tune 670NC
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable—✓★
Weight0.40 kg0.17 kg★
Ear Cushioncushionedsoft ear cushions
Headbandcushionedpadded headband
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm★32 mm
Drivers—1★
Freq Min10 Hz★20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance70 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB★98 dB
Max SPL—95 dB★
Hi-Res Audio—✗
Codecs—SBC, AAC, LC3
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable✓✓
Cable Length3.5 m1.2192000150680542 m
Battery
Battery Life—70 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—5min=3hrs
Charging—USB-C★
Capacity—690 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone✗✓★
Mic Count—1★
NC Mic—✓★
Boom Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistant—voice assistant
Touch Controls—✗
App—JBL Headphones
Gaming Mode—✓★
Water ResistanceWater-Resistant—

Pros & Cons

JVC HARX500

  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong sound (77th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (72nd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

JBL Tune 670NC

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile

Pricing

JVC HARX500 is MX$332 cheaper (1.5x less).

JVC HARX5000.071score per dollar
vs
JBL Tune 670NC0.092score per dollar

JBL Tune 670NC offers 1.3x better value for money

JVC HARX500

JBL Tune 670NC

Verdict

★ Winner: JBL Tune 670NC

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 40 specs.

JBL Tune 670NC Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider