Roland V-Drums VMH-D1
Roland
40 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Roland V-Drums VMH-D1
82 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews
The Roland V-Drums headphones receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their sound quality, comfort, and build. Users praise the clear, powerful audio with excellent bass drum reproduction and low latency, making them ideal for electronic drum kits. However, one detailed negative review criticizes the sound as dull and compressed, the ear cups as too small, and the cable design as insecure for drumming. Overall, most verified buyers find them a great value for the price range.
Pros
- Clear and powerful sound
- Excellent bass drum reproduction
- Comfortable for long sessions
- Solid build quality
- Low latency for e-kits
Cons
- Ear cups too small for some
- Sound can be dull and compressed
- Cable lacks secure locking mechanism
- Flimsy included pouch
- Drum hook feels gimmicky
Sound quality 7
Comfort 6
Build quality 5
Ear cup size 4
Cable design 4
Value for money 3
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Roland V-Drums VMH-D1 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | cushioned headband | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dual-diaphragm | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 45 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Roland V-Drums VMH-D1
- Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
Roland V-Drums VMH-D10.010score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.025score per dollar
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 offers 2.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.
