Sennheiser HD 200 PRO 507182
Sennheiser
52 Overall Score
vs
QCY H3 PRO
QCY
86 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Work
Commute
Music
Studio
Calls
Specifications
| Sennheiser HD 200 PRO 507182 | QCY H3 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.23 kg |
| Ear Cushion | Soft ear cushions | protein leather |
| Headband | materials with direct contact carefully | leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | 2 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 55 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 0.17000000178813934 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 5 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | QCY App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Pros & Cons
Sennheiser HD 200 PRO 507182
- Strong anc (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong comfort (74th percentile)
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average connectivity (27th percentile)
QCY H3 PRO
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Pricing
Sennheiser HD 200 PRO 5071820.036score per dollar
vs
QCY H3 PRO0.098score per dollar
QCY H3 PRO offers 2.7x better value for money
Sennheiser HD 200 PRO 507182
QCY H3 PRO
Verdict
Winner: QCY H3 PRO
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 35 specs.
