AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO
AKG
46 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO
82 out of 100 medium confidence 26 reviews
The AKG K240 headphones are widely praised for their comfortable fit, clear and neutral sound, and excellent value for money. Many users appreciate the semi-open design for long listening sessions without ear fatigue, though some note significant sound leakage. A few reviewers mention that the mids could be stronger and that the build feels adequate but not premium.
Pros
- Comfortable fit for long sessions
- Clear and neutral sound
- Great value for money
- Detachable long cable
- Semi-open design reduces ear heat
Cons
- Significant sound leakage
- Mids could be stronger
- Build feels adequate not premium
- Ears can get hot after 25-30 minutes
- Not ideal for sound isolation
Comfort 12
Sound quality 18
Value for money 8
Sound leakage 4
Build quality 5
Cable length 3
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | semi-open | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.24 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | over-ear pads | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | flexible steel structure | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 30 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 15 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 25 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 55 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 104 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AKG K240 Studio Professional Semi-Open Stereo Headphones, Bundle with Headphone Holder | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO0.043score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.025score per dollar
AKG K240 Studio K240STUDIO offers 1.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 41 specs.
