Behringer HPM1000
Behringer
13 Overall Score
vs
Philips 6000 series H6509
Philips
73 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Work
Commute
Music
Calls
Studio
Specifications
| Behringer HPM1000 | Philips 6000 series H6509 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | — | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | 0.27 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | memory foam |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Codecs | — | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro - 70 Hours Play Time, Dynamic Bass, Clear Calls, Multipoint Connectivity, Black |
| Surround | — | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro - 70 Hours Play Time, Dynamic Bass, Clear Calls, Multipoint Connectivity, Black | Philips H6509 Wireless Over-Ear Bluetoot |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | USB-C |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 min for 3 hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| App | — | Philips Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Behringer HPM1000
- Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (21st percentile)
- Below average sound (26th percentile)
Philips 6000 series H6509
- Strong anc (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong comfort (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
Behringer HPM10000.041score per dollar
vs
Philips 6000 series H65090.049score per dollar
Philips 6000 series H6509 offers 1.2x better value for money
Behringer HPM1000
Philips 6000 series H6509
Verdict
Winner: Philips 6000 series H6509
Scores 73 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.
