Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
CIQILY S49

CIQILY S49

CIQILY
58 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

CIQILY S49

78 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

Most users are very satisfied with these earbuds, praising their clear sound, long battery life, comfortable fit, and easy pairing. A few reviewers reported issues with one earbud being quiet or the product weakening after a short time, and one noted the controls are touch-sensitive rather than physical buttons. Overall, they are seen as a great value for the price, especially for hands-free calls and music on the go.

Pros
  • Clear sound quality
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Easy pairing
  • Compact carrying case
Cons
  • Left earbud quiet for some
  • Product weakens after two weeks
  • Touch controls instead of buttons
  • No noise cancellation as advertised
👍 Sound quality 6
👍 Battery life 4
👍 Comfort and fit 3
👍 Ease of pairing 3
👍 Value for money 3
🤔 Build quality 3

Scores

Budget
Technics
99
CIQILY
67
Travel
Technics
95
CIQILY
52
Calls
Technics
93
CIQILY
46
Commute
Technics
90
CIQILY
53
Music
Technics
90
CIQILY
45
Gaming
Technics
88
CIQILY
65
Fitness
Technics
80
CIQILY
42

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100CIQILY S49
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs—
Weight0.05 kg★0.08 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz16 Hz★
Freq Max40 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω—
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCWireless Headphone,Bluetooth 5.3 Earbuds for Samsung Galaxy A17 A16 A15 A56 A36 S26 S25 Ultra S24 S23 S22 S20 60H Playback with Dual LED Display HiFi Stereo Wireless Earphone for iPhone 16e 16 15 Pro
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.35.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs60 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓✓
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✓★
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX7

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

CIQILY S49

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (75th percentile)
  • Strong anc (73rd percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Pricing

CIQILY S49 is MX$6,171 cheaper (11.6x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.015score per dollar
vs
CIQILY S490.100score per dollar

CIQILY S49 offers 6.7x better value for money

Technics EAH-AZ100

CIQILY S49

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider