Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
MOSWAG

MOSWAG

MOSWAG
47 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

MOSWAG

78 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

Overall, users find these earphones to be a good value with decent sound quality and comfortable fit. Many appreciate the included carrying pouch and the clear audio for music and podcasts. The main drawbacks are a non-functional volume control that jumps to max, and earbuds that may be too large for some ears. Despite these issues, most buyers are satisfied for the price.

Pros
  • Good sound quality
  • Comfortable fit
  • Clear audio
  • Includes carrying pouch
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Volume control jumps to max
  • Earbuds too large for some ears
  • Easily pulls out of jack
  • Weak bass
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Comfort and fit 4
👎 Volume control issue 3
👍 Included accessories 3

Scores

Calls
Technics
100
MOSWAG
36
Travel
Technics
100
MOSWAG
31
Music
Technics
94
MOSWAG
43
Commute
Technics
94
MOSWAG
31
Gaming
Technics
92
MOSWAG
52
Budget
Technics
89
MOSWAG
85
Fitness
Technics
88
MOSWAG
35

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100MOSWAG
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless—
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs—
Weight0.01 kg★0.02 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—118 dB★
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCMOSWAG Wired Earbuds, 3.5mm Jack in-Ear Headphones with Microphone Volum Control Clear Calls Suitable for iPhone, iPad, Samsung, Computer, Laptop, School Students, Black
SurroundDolby Atmos, Spatial Audio—
Noise Control
ANC✓★✗
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★✗
Bluetooth5.3★—
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth3.5mm
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4—

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

MOSWAG

  • Strong affordability (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong sound (77th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Pricing

MOSWAG is MX$7,871 cheaper (40.6x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.012score per dollar
vs
MOSWAG0.237score per dollar

MOSWAG offers 19.8x better value for money

Technics EAH-AZ100

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider