Sony WF-C700N

Sony WF-C700N

Sony
73 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony WF-C700N

58 out of 100 high confidence 314 reviews

The Sony WF-C700N earbuds receive mixed feedback. Many users praise the sound quality, comfort, and noise cancellation for the price, but a significant number report issues with fit, connectivity, and durability, with some experiencing failures within months. The microphone quality on calls is a common complaint, and the mandatory app setup frustrates some. Overall, it's a budget-friendly option with solid audio but inconsistent reliability.

Pros
  • Great sound quality for price
  • Comfortable fit
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Good battery life
  • Lightweight design
Cons
  • Poor microphone quality on calls
  • Fit issues for some users
  • Connectivity problems
  • Durability concerns
  • Mandatory app installation
👍 Sound quality 25
🤔 Noise cancellation 18
🤔 Fit and comfort 20
👍 Battery life 12
👎 Microphone quality 8
👎 Connectivity 10

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Calls
Sony
83
Technics
100
Travel
Sony
84
Technics
100
Music
Sony
74
Technics
94
Commute
Sony
86
Technics
94
Gaming
Sony
76
Technics
92
Budget
Sony
90
Technics
88
Fitness
Sony
75
Technics
88

Specifications

Sony WF-C700NTechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, Large5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.03 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size5 mm10 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min33 Hz20 Hz★
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz★
Impedance—16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsSBC, AACAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround7.1 Virtual SurroundDolby Atmos, Spatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.25.3★
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSPAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint✓✓
Wired Connector—Bluetooth
Range10 m10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life15 hrs★8 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs★2.5 hrs
Fast Charging10 minute quick charging gives you up to an hour of extra play time15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery15 hrs28 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✗✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count26★
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✗✓★
AppSony | Headphones ConnectAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode✗✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX4

Pros & Cons

Sony WF-C700N

  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong mic (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Pricing

Sony WF-C700N

No current pricing available

Technics EAH-AZ100

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider