TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
Skullcandy S2IMY-M692

Skullcandy S2IMY-M692

Skullcandy
34 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
79
Skullcandy
45
Gaming
TOZO
79
Skullcandy
23
Travel
TOZO
78
Skullcandy
19
Fitness
TOZO
72
Skullcandy
20
Calls
TOZO
70
Skullcandy
23
Commute
TOZO
70
Skullcandy
18
Music
TOZO
68
Skullcandy
22

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsSkullcandy S2IMY-M692
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMediumS, M
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB92 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Skullcandy S2IMY-M692

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Pricing

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Skullcandy S2IMY-M692

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider