TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
Xmenha X57

Xmenha X57

Xmenha
20 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
79
Xmenha
26
Gaming
TOZO
79
Xmenha
16
Travel
TOZO
78
Xmenha
28
Fitness
TOZO
72
Xmenha
35
Calls
TOZO
70
Xmenha
13
Commute
TOZO
70
Xmenha
23
Music
TOZO
68
Xmenha
19

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsXmenha X57
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs3 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs72 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Xmenha X57

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness