Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
Sennheiser CX 80S

Sennheiser CX 80S

Sennheiser
49 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100

92 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

Users are overwhelmingly positive about the Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds, praising the exceptional sound quality, especially with LDAC and Dolby Atmos, and the surprisingly effective AI-powered call noise cancellation that blocks out background noise like screaming kids or car washes. Comfort, customization via the app, and solid battery life are also highlighted. The only potential downside mentioned is the high price, but most feel the premium features justify the cost.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality with LDAC
  • AI-powered call noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit for long wear
  • Customizable EQ via app
  • Solid battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • ANC slightly weaker than AZ80
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Call quality 2
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 4
👍 Battery life 2
🤔 Value for money 3

Sennheiser CX 80S

72 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The Sennheiser wired earbuds receive mixed feedback. Many users praise the clear, balanced sound and excellent value for the low price, with some calling them the best wired earbuds under $20. However, several reviews note weak bass, durability concerns like one side dying after a year, and one user found the sound quality surprisingly poor for the brand. Overall, they are seen as a solid budget option with good clarity but not for bass lovers.

Pros
  • Clear and balanced sound
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good clarity and detail
  • Comfortable fit
  • Lightweight design
Cons
  • Weak bass response
  • Durability concerns (one side dies)
  • Thin cable
  • Inconsistent sound quality across units
  • Button control issues
🤔 Sound quality 8
👍 Value for money 5
👎 Bass performance 4
👎 Durability 3
🤔 Build quality 3
👍 Comfort 2

Scores

Budget
Technics
98
Sennheiser
63
Travel
Technics
95
Sennheiser
40
Calls
Technics
93
Sennheiser
33
Commute
Technics
90
Sennheiser
42
Music
Technics
90
Sennheiser
56
Gaming
Technics
88
Sennheiser
45
Fitness
Technics
80
Sennheiser
37

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100Sennheiser CX 80S
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-tip
Ear Tips5 x Eartip PairsS, M, L
Weight0.05 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm★9.699999809265137 mm
Drivers19★
Freq Min20 Hz17 Hz★
Freq Max40 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω28 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCSennheiser CX 80S 3.5 mm, angled Connector Ear canal Wired In-Ear Headphones
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓★✗
Bluetooth5.3★—
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth3.5mm
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX4—

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Sennheiser CX 80S

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sennheiser CX 80S is MX$6,275 cheaper (14.1x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.015score per dollar
vs
Sennheiser CX 80S0.103score per dollar

Sennheiser CX 80S offers 6.9x better value for money

Technics EAH-AZ100

Sennheiser CX 80S

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider