Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
JLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB

JLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB

JLab
79 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

92 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their exceptional sound quality, particularly with LDAC and Dolby Atmos. Users highlight the surprisingly effective AI-powered call noise cancellation, which blocks out background noise like screaming children or car washes. Comfort and customization via the app are also praised, though some note the ANC is slightly weaker than the previous AZ80 model.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality with LDAC
  • AI-powered call noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit for hours
  • Customizable EQ via app
  • Effective ANC and pass-through modes
Cons
  • High price point ($300)
  • ANC slightly weaker than AZ80
  • Touch controls take getting used to
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Call quality 3
🤔 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 4
👍 Battery life 2
🤔 Value for money 3

JLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB

82 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The JLab Epic Pods ANC earbuds receive strong praise for their excellent sound quality, effective noise cancellation, and long battery life. Many users find them a great value compared to premium brands like Apple and Samsung, with comfortable fit and useful app features. However, some reviewers report issues with call quality, overly sensitive touch controls, and a confusing app interface, while a few experienced hardware failures. Overall, they are highly recommended for music and everyday use, but may not be ideal for frequent phone calls.

Pros
  • Excellent sound quality
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Poor call quality
  • Overly sensitive touch controls
  • Confusing app interface
  • Bulky fit for long sessions
  • Hardware failure risk
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Noise cancellation 9
👍 Battery life 8
👍 Value for money 6
👎 Call quality 5
🤔 Touch controls 4

Scores

Travel
Technics
94
JLab
75
Budget
Technics
94
JLab
76
Calls
Technics
92
JLab
69
Music
Technics
90
JLab
75
Commute
Technics
89
JLab
78
Gaming
Technics
88
JLab
71
Fitness
Technics
78
JLab
65

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100-NJLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessstem
Ear TipsExtra large, Large, Medium, Smalls
Weight0.05 kg★—
Audio
Driver Typedynamicbalanced armature
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers12★
Freq Min20 Hz★—
Freq Max40 kHz★—
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBCLDAC, AAC
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.35.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓✓
Wired ConnectorBluetoothBluetooth
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs10 hrs★
Charge Time2.5 hrs0.17000000178813934 hrs★
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C★proprietary
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs40 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-C★proprietary
Wireless Charging✓✓
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count66
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOSJLab App
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX4IP55

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

JLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)

Pricing

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

JLab Epic Pods EBEPPODSBLK50WEB

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-N Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider