Nothing Ear

Nothing Ear

Nothing
83 Overall Score
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Nothing
84
TOZO
79
Budget
Nothing
78
TOZO
79
Travel
Nothing
76
TOZO
78
Commute
Nothing
78
TOZO
70
Calls
Nothing
75
TOZO
70
Fitness
Nothing
47
TOZO
72
Music
Nothing
72
TOZO
68

Specifications

Nothing EarTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, LMedium
Weight0.05 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size11 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max5 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLHDC, LDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybridhybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8.5 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time0.17000000178813934 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 10 hours playback10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery40.5 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count64
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantChatGPTOther
Touch Controls
AppNothing XTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP54IPX5

Pros & Cons

Nothing Ear

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Verdict

Tie

Both products are closely matched - Nothing Ear wins 5 specs while TOZO Crystal Pods wins 6.

Nothing Ear Better at:

CallsMusicGamingCommute

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

Fitness