HP OMEN GT16-0089 Ceramic White

HP OMEN GT16-0089 Ceramic White

HP
79 Overall Score
vs
Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

Apple
95 Overall Score

Scores

Business
HP
73
Apple
96
Home Office
HP
75
Apple
89
Compact
HP
41
Apple
86
Developer
HP
78
Apple
83
Gaming
HP
82
Apple
43
Workstation
HP
78
Apple
75
Creator
HP
76
Apple
59
Ai Llm
HP
64
Apple
65

Specifications

HP OMEN GT16-0089Apple Mac Studio M4 Max
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen™ 7 8700F (up to 5.0 GHz max boost clock, 16 MB L3 cache, 8 cores, 16 threads)8,9Apple M4 Max
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
43,903
Cores814
Frequency4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070Apple M4 Max 32-core
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
17,798
Typediscreteintegrated
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7Unified
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB36 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5
Storage 12 TB512 GB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factordesktopsff
PSU600W
Weight14.50 kg2.74 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports36
USB Ports72
ThunderboltThunderbolt 5 x 4
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b1x HDMI
DisplayPort1 HDMI 2.1b3 DisplayPort™ 2.1b0
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomemacOS

Pros & Cons

HP OMEN GT16-0089 Ceramic White

  • Strong port selection (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong gpu (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong reliability (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port selection (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average storage (32nd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Apple Mac Studio M4 Max

Scores 95 overall, wins 4 of 8 usage categories and 6 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0089 Better at:

GamingCreatorWorkstation

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Better at:

CompactBusinessDeveloperHome Office