Lenovo M Series Tiny ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 Tiny

Lenovo M Series Tiny ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 Tiny

Lenovo
51 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Lenovo
12
HP
91
Business
Lenovo
53
HP
87
Developer
Lenovo
48
HP
87
Creator
Lenovo
20
HP
87
Home Office
Lenovo
49
HP
87
Workstation
Lenovo
44
HP
85
Ai Llm
Lenovo
22
HP
67
Compact
Lenovo
55
HP
31

Specifications

Lenovo M Series Tiny ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 TinyHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 5 8500GEAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
21,526
30,931
Cores68
Frequency3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*740MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
3,345
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSystem SharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU90W850W
Weight1.32 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMIOptional Expansion port (DP/HDMI/VGA/Serial/USB-C®)1 x HDMI
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4 (high bit rate 2)3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWiFi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetRJ45 LAN (1GB out-of-brand Dash) | Realtek Wi-Fi 6 RTL8852BE 2x2 AX | AMD Wi-Fi 6E RZ616 2x2 AX | Bluetooth® 5.3Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

Lenovo M Series Tiny ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 Tiny

  • Strong reliability (71st percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

Lenovo M Series Tiny ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 Tiny Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation