Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
Intel
98 Overall Score
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2
AMD
50 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
88 out of 100 high confidence 32 reviews
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is overwhelmingly praised for its raw performance, especially in 4K gaming and heavy multitasking, with users noting significant upgrades from older CPUs. It runs cool with proper cooling solutions, and its efficiency and support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are highlighted as major advantages. Some mention that it may not beat AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming, but it excels at 4K and productivity. A few note the lack of a cooler and tray packaging as minor drawbacks, but overall sentiment is very positive.
Pros
- Excellent 4K gaming performance
- Strong multitasking and productivity
- Runs cool with proper cooling
- Supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
- Power efficient (125W TDP)
Cons
- No cooler included
- Tray packaging (no retail box)
- May lag AMD in 1080p/1440p gaming
- Requires BIOS adjustments for best performance
- Premium price
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Ai Llm
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Server
Specifications
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | A-Series APU |
| Model | 285K | A10-6700 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Richland |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | 32 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 4 |
| P-cores | 8★ | 4 |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 24★ | 4 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 36★ | 8 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | Socket FM2 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 16 |
| TDP | 125 | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (19th percentile)19th %ile
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2
- Strong affordability (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
Pricing
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 18510.007score per dollar
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM20.017score per dollar
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2 offers 2.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 29 specs.