SJCAM C400 vs Manfrotto 22
SJCAM C400
SJCAM
50 Overall Score
vs
Manfrotto 22 orange
Manfrotto
23 Overall Score
Scores
Beginner
Youtube
Video
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Product Photography
Streaming
Photography
Specifications
| SJCAM C400 | Manfrotto 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | MP4 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.53 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
Pros & Cons
SJCAM C400
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average sensor (33rd percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Manfrotto 22 orange
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average social proof (24th percentile)
- Below average video (25th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
Pricing
SJCAM C4000.014score per dollar
vs
Manfrotto 22 orange0.011score per dollar
SJCAM C400 offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: SJCAM C400
Scores 50 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 11 specs.
