Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
20 Overall Score
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026
LIYTIFOR
46 Overall Score
Scores
Product Photography
Streaming
Beginner
Photography
Video
Youtube
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Vlogging
Specifications
| Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | LIYTIFOR LR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/1.7-inch | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 80 MP★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 5K |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | JPEG/MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3.5"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average sensor (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026
- Strong sensor (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong burst (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong video (79th percentile)
- Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.025score per dollar
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 20260.012score per dollar
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green offers 2.1x better value for money
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026
Verdict
Winner: LIYTIFOR LR1
Scores 46 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.
