Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
18 Overall Score
vs
FLATIC CDR2H
FLATIC
42 Overall Score
Scores
Product Photography
Youtube
Beginner
Video
Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | FLATIC CDR2H | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/1.7-inch | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 64 MP★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 5K |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | — | Type-C |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | — |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average sensor (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
FLATIC CDR2H
- Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong video (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong display (68th percentile)
- Below average burst (32nd percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.022score per dollar
vs
FLATIC CDR2H0.027score per dollar
FLATIC CDR2H offers 1.2x better value for money
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
FLATIC CDR2H
Verdict
Winner: FLATIC CDR2H
Scores 42 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
