HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G Red 2025
HOTWAV
69 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
Samsung
51 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Art Design
Entertainment
Business
Productivity
Student
Reading
Spezifikationen
| HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 24 GB★ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 64 GB |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11" | 8.7" |
| Resolution | — | 800 px★ |
| Panel | — | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6★ | 802.11g |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Cellular | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓★ | — |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | — |
| Face Unlock | ✓★ | — |
| IP Rating | IP68 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.84 kg | 0.48 kg★ |
| OS | Android 15 | Android |
Vor- & Nachteile
HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G Red 2025
- Strong ram (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong cpu (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average battery (31th percentile)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong gpu (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average screen (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (28th percentile)
- Below average storage (28th percentile)
- Below average ram (32th percentile)
Preise
HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G Red 20250.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 20220.016Score pro Dollar
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G Red 2025
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 8.7" SM-X115 Graphite 2022
Fazit
Gewinner: HOTWAV R9 Ultra 5G 11" R9 Ultra 5G
Scores 69 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.
