Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
Xiaomi
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Lite Gray 2025
Samsung
53 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Entertainment
Reading
Art Design
Student
Productivity
Business
Spezifikationen
| Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2800 MHz | Exynos 1380★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB★ | 6 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | SSD★ | — |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 10.9" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | 2112 px |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | 90 Hz |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stylus Model | — | S Pen |
| Fingerprint Reader | — | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | — | ✓★ |
| IP Rating | — | IP42 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.52 kg |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Lite Gray 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong battery (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong connectivity (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average cpu (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average gpu (8th percentile)8th %ile
Preise
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 20250.012Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Lite Gray 20250.008Score pro Dollar
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Lite Gray 2025
Fazit
Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG
Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 23 specs.
