Getac UX10 10.1" UX10G2

Getac UX10 10.1" UX10G2

Getac
34 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
78 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
Getac
41
Xiaomi
82
Art Design
Getac
40
Xiaomi
80
Reading
Getac
36
Xiaomi
79
Productivity
Getac
34
Xiaomi
71
Student
Getac
32
Xiaomi
69
Business
Getac
27
Xiaomi
62

Spezifikationen

Getac UX10 10.1" UX10G2Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Processor
CPUIntel Core i5 10310U3 GHz
CPU Multi-Core Score
5,917
Keine Daten
Cores48
GPUUHD Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
Keine Daten
Memory & Storage
RAM8 GB12 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4
Storage256 GB512 GB
Storage TypeNVMe SSD
Expandable
Display
Size10.1"11.2"
Resolution1920 px3200 px
PanelIPSLCD
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Brightness1000 nits800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.4
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Physical
Weight1.31 kg0.45 kg
OSWindows 11 ProHyperOS 2

Vor- & Nachteile

Getac UX10 10.1" UX10G2

  • Strong storage (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong screen (74th percentile)
  • Strong ram (68th percentile)
  • Below average cpu (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average gpu (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
  • Below average battery (32nd percentile)

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 23 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Besser bei:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment