Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7" SM-T225 Gray 2021
Samsung
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
UMIDIGI
68 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Art Design
Reading
Business
Entertainment
Student
Productivity
Spezifikationen
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7" SM-T225 | UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Apple M2 ★ | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| GPU | PowerVR | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 16 GB★ |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB★ |
| Storage Type | eMMC★ | — |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 8.7" | 11" |
| Resolution | 800 px★ | — |
| Panel | LCD | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth v5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Cellular | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | — | ✓★ |
| Fingerprint Reader | — | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | ✓ | ✓ |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 & IP69K |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.25 kg★ | 0.76 kg |
| OS | Android 11 | Android |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7" SM-T225 Gray 2021
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (72nd percentile)
- Strong cpu (66th percentile)
- Below average screen (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average storage (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average ram (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average screen (26th percentile)
Preise
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7" SM-T225 Gray 20210.010Score pro Dollar
vs
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 20230.012Score pro Dollar
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 8.7" SM-T225 Gray 2021
UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1 Black 2023
Fazit
Gewinner: UMIDIGI Active T1 11" Active T1
Scores 68 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
