BESTTAB T60

BESTTAB T60

BESTTAB
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025

Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025

Xiaomi
77 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
BESTTAB
57
Xiaomi
79
Reading
BESTTAB
59
Xiaomi
78
Art Design
BESTTAB
61
Xiaomi
75
Student
BESTTAB
61
Xiaomi
67
Productivity
BESTTAB
58
Xiaomi
62
Business
BESTTAB
60
Xiaomi
60

Spezifikationen

BESTTAB T60Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG
Processor
CPUAMD Ryzen 5 16002800 MHz
CPU Multi-Core Score
12,251
Keine Daten
Cores88
GPUMali Gpu
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeSSD
Expandable
Display
Size12"11.2"
Resolution3200 px
PanelLCDLCD
Refresh Rate90 Hz144 Hz
Brightness350 nits800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWiFi 5Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Face Unlock
Physical
Weight1.81 kg0.45 kg
OSAndroid 16Android 14

Vor- & Nachteile

BESTTAB T60

  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong ram (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)

Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

BESTTAB T600.009Score pro Dollar
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 20250.012Score pro Dollar

Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG

Scores 77 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Besser bei:

ReadingStudentArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen