Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
67 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
Kingston
57
Crucial
95
Gaming
Kingston
59
Crucial
94
Workstation
Kingston
59
Crucial
88
Laptop
Kingston
57
Crucial
82
Budget
Kingston
55
Crucial
82
Portable
Kingston
15
Crucial
25

Spezifikationen

Kingston DC2000BCrucial T710
Drive
Capacity
960
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)Keine Daten
14,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)Keine Daten
13,800
Random Read (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—Micron
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
700
2,400
MTBF (hours)Keine Daten
1,500,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★✗

Vor- & Nachteile

Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong speed (68th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (9th percentile)9th %ile

Crucial T710 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial T710

Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation