Samsung 9100 PRO
Samsung
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
XPG Mars 980 Blade
XPG
80 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Workstation
Console
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Samsung 9100 PRO | XPG Mars 980 Blade | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5 | 5 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | Samsung in-house Controller | SMI SM2508 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung 9100 PRO
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
XPG Mars 980 Blade
- Strong random (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong endurance (81st percentile)81st %ile
Fazit
Gewinner: Samsung 9100 PRO
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.