Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
64 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Timetec
Timetec
37 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Kingston FURY Beast | Timetec | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 40 | 19★ |
| Timings | 40-40-40 | — |
| Voltage | 1.25 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Below average latency (32nd percentile)
Timetec
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
Kingston FURY Beast0.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Timetec0.028Score pro Dollar
Timetec bietet 2.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kingston FURY Beast
Scores 64 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
