Team Group (TED3L16G1600C11DC-S01)
Team Group
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
64 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Team Group | Kingston FURY Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3L | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 204 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 40 |
| Timings | 11-11-11-28 | 40-40-40 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.25★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Team Group (TED3L16G1600C11DC-S01)
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong affordability (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Below average latency (32nd percentile)
Preise
Team Group (TED3L16G1600C11DC-S01)0.035Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston FURY Beast0.011Score pro Dollar
Team Group (TED3L16G1600C11DC-S01) bietet 3.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kingston FURY Beast
Scores 64 overall, wins 3 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
