Motorola Razr Fold PBAY0003US Pantone Blackened Blue 512GB
Motorola
82 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MIRO C1 Black 128GB
MIRO
25 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Battery Life
Flagship
Foldable
Compact
Photography
Budget
Business
Rugged
Spezifikationen
| Motorola Razr Fold PBAY0003US | MIRO C1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 8.1 | 6.6 |
| Display Type | OLED★ | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | — | 720 x 1612 |
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz★ | 90 Hz |
| Brightness | 5000 nits★ | — |
| HDR | ✓★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Mobile Platform | — |
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Mobile Platform | Mali-G57 |
| CPU Cores | — | 8★ |
| CPU Speed | 3.80★ | 1.80 |
| RAM | 16 GB★ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Camera Count | 3★ | 2 |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP★ | 2 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP★ | — |
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 50 MP★ |
| Video | 8K at 30fps★ | — |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 6,000 mAh★ | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 80W★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Fast Charging | TurboPower | — |
| Connector | USB-C★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | Wi-Fi 5 |
| NFC | ✓★ | — |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| SIM | eSIM, Standard SIM | Nano SIM |
| eSIM | ✓★ | — |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP48 | — |
| Form Factor | foldable | bar |
| Weight | 0.24 kg | 0.19 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | Yes | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓★ | — |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Motorola Razr Fold PBAY0003US Pantone Blackened Blue 512GB
- Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong performance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong camera (90th percentile)90th %ile
MIRO C1 Black 128GB
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (31st percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Motorola Razr Fold PBAY0003US
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 21 of 37 specs.