Samsung ViewFinity LS34C650UANXGO 34"
Samsung
67 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Samsung ViewFinity LS34C650UANXGO 34" | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 34" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,000 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 100 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 1.07 Billion Colors (10-Bit) | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 7.98 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung ViewFinity LS34C650UANXGO 34"
- Strong display (79th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Strong ergonomic (73rd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
Samsung ViewFinity LS34C650UANXGO 34"0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.008Score pro Dollar
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026 bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Samsung ViewFinity LS34C650UANXGO 34"
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
Fazit
Gewinner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 28 specs.
