HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black
HP
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 49" Black 2020
Dell
64 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" | Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 49" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 49" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 5120 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 3,800 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 280 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 350 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95 percent | 99% sRGB |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | N/A | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 106W | 60W★ |
| Weight | 8.35 kg★ | 17.20 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong performance (90th percentile)90th %ile
Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 49" Black 2020
- Strong display (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong color (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
Preise
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black0.006Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 49" Black 20200.001Score pro Dollar
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black bietet 6.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Black
Dell UltraSharp U4919DW 49" Black 2020
Fazit
Gewinner: HP OMEN 27qs G2 27"
Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 30 specs.
