ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KADY KADY-001 15.6"
KADY
49 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Portable
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | KADY KADY-001 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 15.6" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | — |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | — |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 100% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2 | 2 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 0.70 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
KADY KADY-001 15.6"
- Strong portability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong connectivity (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average display (21st percentile)
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.009Score pro Dollar
vs
KADY KADY-001 15.6"0.027Score pro Dollar
KADY KADY-001 15.6" bietet 3.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
KADY KADY-001 15.6"
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
