ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" Black 2024
LG
71 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,000 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 180 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 99% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W | 19W★ |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 4.80 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" Black 2024
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong performance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong color (70th percentile)
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.007Score pro Dollar
vs
LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" Black 20240.015Score pro Dollar
LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" Black 2024 bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
LG UltraGear 27GS60QC-B 27" Black 2024
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.
