Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Ulanzi
64 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video Cinema
Sony
93
Ulanzi
48
Street
Sony
92
Ulanzi
51
Budget
Sony
87
Ulanzi
57
Professional
Sony
86
Ulanzi
47
Travel
Sony
85
Ulanzi
34
Portrait
Sony
80
Ulanzi
61
Wildlife Sports
Sony
79
Ulanzi
41
Macro
Sony
64
Ulanzi
79
Landscape
Sony
69
Ulanzi
39

Spezifikationen

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mmUlanzi WL-1 18mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm18 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements11
Coating30-Layer Nano-Coating Double-Side
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony Esony
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm18 mm
Max Magnification0.215x10X

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (72th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm is 2.049 MX$ cheaper (2.6x less).

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027Score pro Dollar
vs
Ulanzi WL-1 18mm0.050Score pro Dollar

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm Besser bei:

Macro

Auch in Betracht ziehen