Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm

Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm

Hasselblad
31 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Canon
98
Hasselblad
34
Portrait
Canon
96
Hasselblad
26
Video Cinema
Canon
89
Hasselblad
32
Street
Canon
82
Hasselblad
37
Travel
Canon
80
Hasselblad
32
Wildlife Sports
Canon
76
Hasselblad
42
Landscape
Canon
75
Hasselblad
42
Professional
Canon
74
Hasselblad
37
Macro
Canon
67
Hasselblad
36

Spezifikationen

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMHasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm35 mm
Elements1616
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements14
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.2-4.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountCanon EF-SHasselblad X
FormatAPS-Cmedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg0.81 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMstepping motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm320 mm
Max Magnification0.28x0.09 to 0.16x

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile

Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (69th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average social proof (22nd percentile)
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports